blog advertising is good for you

Who we are
Gerald Weinand, Editor

Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Event Calendar
March 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 * * *
<< (add event) >>

Follow Dirigo Blue on


See Site Visits

Abortion Rights

Utah law makes miscarriage a crime, punishable by up to life in prison

by: Gerald Weinand

Fri Feb 26, 2010 at 07:33:39 AM EST

A proposed law in Utah that just awaits the signature of that state's governor to become law, would make a miscarriage a crime if it was shown to be caused by "intentional, knowing, or reckless acts." From an article in the online journal Jezebel, there is more (h/t leolabeth):

A new Utah law could charge women with homicide if they miscarry, making women's rights advocates concerned that women will be brought up on murder charges for drinking, failing to wear a seatbelt, or falling down the stairs.

The bill passed Utah's state legislature last Thursday and still needs final approval by the governor, but it continues to gain attention this week for its unusually restrictive language. It doesn't address legal abortion, but allows punishment up to life in prison for an "intentional, knowing, or reckless act" that leads to a miscarriage or abortion without a doctor's supervision. Especially concerning to some Utah Democrats and many women's rights activists is the word "reckless" - writing for RH Reality Check, Rachel Larris says,

Using the legal standard of "reckless behavior" all a district attorney needs to show is that a woman behaved in a manner that is thought to cause miscarriage, even if she didn't intend to lose the pregnancy. Drink too much alcohol and have a miscarriage? Under the new law such actions could be cause for prosecution.

Women might also make themselves open to prosecution if they failed to wear a seatbelt and got in a car accident, if they stayed with an abusive partner, or even if they fell down the stairs, like a woman in Iowa who found herself jailed on suspicion of "attempted feticide."

I think about my wife's three pregnancies, and while she never took any risks, one wonders how others might view the hikes up Mt. Battie we did, or swimming in lakes, or even riding bikes to the local market. What about those nights that she drove home after a night class from Orono to Camden, or when there was an inch of snow on the road?

I certainly don't approve of women that drink alcohol or smoke while their pregnant (or while children are in their car, for that matter), despite that nearly everyone my age and older had a mother that did. Nor would I think skydiving while seven months pregnant is a good idea.

But laws like this only further objectify women, forcing them to become vessels of creation. What's next - mandatory bed rest?

Discuss :: (1 Comments)

Pingree vows to vote "No" on health reform bill that includes Stupak-Pitts amendment

by: Gerald Weinand

Tue Nov 10, 2009 at 13:51:50 PM EST

Greg Sargent reported earlier that over forty House members have pledged to vote against H.R. 3962 if it includes the Stupak-Pitts amendment:

The Honorable Nancy Pelosi
Speaker
U.S. House of Representatives
H-232 Capitol
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Madam Speaker:

As members of Congress we believe that women should have access to a full range of reproductive health care. Health care reform must not be misused as an opportunity to restrict women's access to reproductive health services.

The Stupak-Pitts amendment to H.R. 3962, The Affordable Healthcare for America Act, represents an unprecedented and unacceptable restriction on women's ability to access the full range of reproductive health services to which they are lawfully entitled. We will not vote for a conference report that contains language that restricts women's right to choose any further than current law.

This afternoon, Willy Ritch, Communications Director for Rep. Chellie Pingree, told me that Rep. Pingree intends to sign onto this letter upon her return to Washington.

While not unexpected, it is great to see Rep. Pingree out in front of this issue. That some would restrict a woman's access to a legal procedure simply because they may be of lesser means is unconscionable, and again Rep. Pingree demonstrates her unflagging support of the rights of all women to control their own bodies.

Thank you Chellie Pingree.

Discuss :: (6 Comments)

blog advertising is good for you

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


2010 Gubernatorial

Democrats

Donna Dion
Patrick McGowan
Libby Mitchell
John Richardson
Steve Rowe
Rosa Scarcelli

Green/Independents

Eliot Cutler
Lynne Williams



blog advertising is good for you


GET YOUR MUG ON
AT THE
DIRIGO BLUE STORE




DIRIGO BLUE is available as an iPhone App

Blog Roll

Maine Blogs

Alna Harridan
AsMaineGoeslolz
Augusta Insider
MPBN Capitol Connection
Collins Watch
DCW
Kennebec Blues
Maine Owl
Maine Politics
Al Diamon's Media Mutt
My K Street
Protect Maine Equality
Susan Cover on Politics
Union Maine
White Noise Insanity

National Blogs

AMERICAblog
Atrios
Blue Hampshire
Blue Mass Group
Burnt Orange Report TX
Calitics CA
Daily Kos
FireDogLake
Hillbilly Report KY
Hoosier Pundit IN
Kansas Free Press
My Left Nutmeg CT
OpenLeft
Pam's House Blend
Square State CO
Talking Points Memo

Government Blogs

Flu.gov
OMB Orszag
DoT LaHood's Fast Lane

Allwords Online Dictionary


Maine News Outlets

All Maine Points
Bangor Daily News
Brunswick Times Record
Lewiston Sun Journal
Lincoln County News
Maine Campus
Quoddy Times
Portland Phoenix
Portland Press Herald



State Party Sites

Maine Democratic Party

Androscoggin Dems
Aroostook Dems
Cumberland Dems
Franklin Dems
Hancock Dems
Kennebec Dems
Knox Dems
Lincoln Dems
Oxford Dems
Penobscot Dems
Piscataquis Dems
Somerset Dems
Sagadahoc Dems
Waldo Dems
Washington Dems
York Dems


Maine Blog Wire



Powered by: SoapBlox